Saturday, 31 August 2024

a

Filled under:

 We wanted to bring to your attention that we have identified some issues related to backups across various databases in our estate. Please note that this email is intended for informational purposes only.

We would like to reassure you that the filesystem is currently under threshold and remains under control. At this time, there is no immediate action required on your part. We are actively liaising with the backup team regarding Incident_23 and have confirmed that the most recent full backup has been successfully completed.

We will continue to monitor the situation closely and will provide updates as necessary. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to reach out.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

Posted By Nikhil02:35

Friday, 30 August 2024

Urgent: Prioritization and Monitoring of Critical Databases

Filled under:

 Dear Team,

I wanted to bring to your attention some important updates regarding our database backups. We have identified several critical and large-sized databases that are currently experiencing issues with their backups. Due to the sensitivity of these databases and the ongoing backup problems, it is essential that these databases receive prioritized attention.

List of Critical Databases:

  • [Insert Database 1]
  • [Insert Database 2]
  • [Insert Database 3]
  • [Insert Database 4]
  • [Insert Database 5]

Please ensure that these databases are closely monitored and that any issues are investigated and addressed proactively. Your immediate focus on these databases is crucial to avoid any potential data loss or further complications.

Additionally, we plan to open a coordination channel soon to facilitate communication and expedite the resolution process if the backup runs longer or if more time is needed for investigation.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Best regards,
Daidipya Upalekar

Posted By Nikhil02:57
Filled under:

 It sounds like you're dealing with a tight situation. Monitoring the backup progress and filesystem usage is crucial. If the backup does cross the 90% filesystem usage threshold, terminating it might indeed be necessary to prevent further issues.

If possible, try to optimize the backup process or free up some space to avoid having to terminate it. In the meantime, keeping an eye on any updates from the channel about the changes made could provide additional insights or solutions.

Good luck with the backup,

Posted By Nikhil02:44

Thursday, 29 August 2024

Filled under:

 I wanted to update you on the ongoing coordination with the backup team regarding our critical databases. I have shared a list of these databases with them and requested their review and potential tuning of the backup settings.

I have asked them to suggest any proactive measures, such as increasing backup streams, adjusting backup timings to avoid conflicts, or other optimizations.

I’ll keep you informed of any further developments or recommendations from their end.

Posted By Nikhil19:01
Filled under:

 As requested, I’m providing the list of critical databases for your review and potential tuning of backup settings. These databases are either very large in size or associated with critical applications:

  1. Database1 - [Size/Importance]
  2. Database2 - [Size/Importance]
  3. Database3 - [Size/Importance]
  4. Database4 - [Size/Importance]
  5. Database5 - [Size/Importance]

Please review these databases and let us know if there are any proactive measures we can take from a backup configuration perspective. For instance, suggestions on increasing backup streams, adjusting backup timings to avoid conflicts, or any other recommendations would be greatly appreciated.

Looking forward to your expert advice.

Posted By Nikhil19:00

Clarification Needed: Subclient Name Discrepancy in Audit Report

Filled under:

 I hope you're doing well.

I’m reaching out regarding a discrepancy identified during a recent audit. The audit team provided a subclient name that differs from what is currently configured in Commvault for our database.

Could you please check if this discrepancy is something you’re aware of or if there have been any recent changes that might explain the difference? Any information you can provide would be helpful to resolve this issue.

Thanks for your assistance!

Posted By Nikhil01:08

Wednesday, 28 August 2024

Backup Configuration for DB - Action Required

Filled under:

Hi Application Team,

I wanted to bring to your attention that the backup for your database has been scheduled and configured at the BCP site, rather than the primary site as per our policy. This configuration has been in place since August 4th. According to our policy, backups should be executed on the primary site unless there is exceptional approval to use the BCP site.

Could you please confirm if this configuration was intentional or if it was part of a specific activity? If it was part of an activity, please share the change request details for our records. If it was not intended, I recommend working with the DBA team to move the backup schedule to the primary site as soon as possible to ensure compliance with our policy.

Please let me know if you need any assistance or if there are any exceptional circumstances we should be aware of.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Posted By Nikhil22:34

Tuesday, 27 August 2024

Filled under:

 It appears to be related to backup and block corruption. However, I have reviewed the situation and can confirm that there is no block corruption in the database. I have attached an excerpt from the validation for your reference. Based on this, you can safely ignore the block corruption alert.

Additionally, the initial alert regarding the backup process can also be disregarded, as it pertains to routine backup operations.

One point of concern is that the backup is currently running from the BCP site, whereas it should ideally be performed from the primary site. According to our policy, backups should not be configured at the BCP site unless there are exceptional approvals. It seems the backup has been running from the BCP site since August 4th, which might be due to recent BCM activities.

Please let me know if you need any further information or if there are additional actions required on this matter.

Posted By Nikhil19:24

Monday, 26 August 2024

Filled under:

 SELECT TABLESPACE_NAME, EXTENT_MANAGEMENT, ALLOCATION_TYPE, INITIAL_EXTENT, NEXT_EXTENT FROM DBA_TABLESPACES WHERE TABLESPACE_NAME = 'tablespace_name';

Posted By Nikhil18:19

Thursday, 22 August 2024

Filled under:

 Thank you for gathering the data and your suggestion to focus on the 20% of servers that have exceeded 50% utilization is well-taken.


This approach is indeed more targeted and efficient, allowing us to allocate resources where they are truly needed. We can monitor the file generation on these specific servers and, if necessary, request an increase in filesystem size for them. This will help optimize our resources while still addressing the servers that require additional space.

Moving forward, I agree that we should consider implementing a process to periodically review the utilization data from the portal. By regularly checking this list of servers, we can proactively manage filesystem sizes and ensure that our database operations remain smooth and uninterrupted.

Posted By Nikhil18:14

Wednesday, 21 August 2024

Proposal to Increase Default /app Filesystem Size for Database Provisioning

Filled under:

 Description:

Current Situation: In our current database provisioning process, the default size allocated for the /app filesystem is 52 GB. While this may be sufficient under normal operations, it has proven to be inadequate in situations where backup failures occur or when backups are delayed. The limited space makes it challenging to retain logs and handle unforeseen issues without risking data loss or system inefficiency.

Problem:

  • Inadequate Space: The existing 52 GB allocation is insufficient to accommodate logs and other critical data when backups are delayed, leading to potential data retention issues and increased risk of backup failures.
  • Operational Challenges: In scenarios where backups do not occur for several days, the current space allocation does not provide enough room to sustain the necessary operations, increasing the risk of running out of space and causing disruptions.

Proposal: I propose increasing the default size of the /app filesystem to 200 GB during database provisioning. This enhancement will provide more room for logs and other necessary files, ensuring the system can handle delays in backups without running into space-related issues.

Benefits:

  • Increased Resilience: A larger /app filesystem will allow the system to retain logs and manage data more effectively in the event of backup delays or failures.
  • Reduced Risk of Downtime: With more space available, the risk of running out of disk space and causing disruptions to database operations will be minimized.
  • Operational Efficiency: Teams will have more flexibility and fewer constraints when dealing with backup-related issues, leading to smoother and more reliable database operations.

Request: Please review this proposal and consider updating the default provisioning settings to allocate 200 GB for the /app filesystem. This change will significantly enhance our ability to manage backup-related issues and improve overall system resilience.

I look forward to your feedback and am happy to collaborate on implementing this change.

Labels: enhancement, provisioning, filesystem, database

Posted By Nikhil06:33

Enhance Database Out-of-Sync Alerting to Include Lag Metrics

Filled under:

 Enhance Database Out-of-Sync Alerting to Include Lag Metrics


Description:

Current Situation: The existing alerting mechanism is designed to notify the team when the PostgreSQL database goes out of sync. However, the current alerts do not provide details on the extent of the lag, which limits our ability to assess the severity of the issue and respond accordingly.

Proposal: I propose enhancing the existing alerting system to include the specific lag value/metric when an out-of-sync event occurs. This enhancement will provide more actionable insights by indicating how far behind the database has fallen, allowing for better prioritization and more informed decision-making.

Implementation Details:

  • Script Modification: There is already an existing script responsible for monitoring the database sync status. We would need to modify this script to capture the lag value (e.g., in seconds, minutes, or transaction count) at the time the database is detected as out of sync.
  • Alerting Changes: Update the alerting mechanism to include the lag value in the notification message. For example:
    • Current Alert: "Database is out of sync."
    • Proposed Alert: "Database is out of sync. Current lag: X [seconds/minutes/transactions]."

Benefits:

  • Improved Response: Engineers will have a better understanding of the issue's severity, allowing for quicker and more appropriate responses.
  • Proactive Monitoring: By monitoring the lag value, we can potentially identify issues before they escalate to a full out-of-sync state.
  • Data-Driven Decisions: Provides a clear metric that can be tracked over time, helping to identify trends and improve overall database performance.

Request: Please review this proposal and assess the feasibility of implementing the suggested changes. If approved, I would recommend involving the engineering team to modify the existing script and update the alerting system accordingly.

Thank you for considering this enhancement. I'm happy to discuss further or provide additional details as needed.

Labels: enhancement, monitoring, database, alerting

Assignees: [Assign to relevant team members]

Milestone: [Set milestone if applicable]

Additional Information: [Include any relevant logs, current scripts, or documentation]

Posted By Nikhil06:27

Tuesday, 20 August 2024

Filled under:

 ChatGPT 4o mini

Posted By Nikhil21:51
Filled under:

 Summary:

We have observed a significant slowness in the PostgreSQL databases hosted in the Zurich data center. The issue has been persistent over the past [specify time period], and it appears to be affecting overall database performance, particularly during backup operations.

Details:

  • Affected Systems: PostgreSQL databases hosted in Zurich
  • Time of Observation: [Specify Date and Time Range]
  • Symptoms:
    • Noticeable delays in query execution and transaction processing.
    • Extended duration of scheduled backup operations.
    • Increased I/O wait times during peak hours.
  • Impact:
    The slowness is causing delays in application response times and could potentially impact critical business operations. Additionally, the prolonged backup times may lead to overlap with production hours, increasing the risk of performance degradation.

Posted By Nikhil02:15
Filled under:

 Indexes can consume a significant amount of disk space

  • Evaluate the necessity of each index. Consider dropping unused or redundant indexes.
  • Periodically reindex tables with REINDEX to reclaim space used by fragmented indexes.
write a mail to user that total disk space 236 GB among which 184GB of table and 27GB of index


I wanted to update you on the current disk space usage for the PostgreSQL database. The total disk space allocated is 236 GB, of which:

  • 184 GB is occupied by tables.
  • 27 GB is consumed by indexes.

identified the following large tables that are significantly contributing to the overall disk space consumption:
These tables, along with the associated indexes, are the primary drivers behind the current storage utilization.


To ensure that the database continues to operate efficiently and that disk space is used optimally, I recommend performing regular maintenance tasks, such as:

  • Vacuuming: To reclaim storage occupied by deleted rows and optimize the performance of the database.
  • Reindexing: To rebuild indexes and ensure they are stored efficiently.
  • Archiving old data: Consider moving old or less frequently accessed data to a different storage tier if possible.

Posted By Nikhil01:21
Filled under:

 SELECT 

    t.schemaname AS schema_name,

    t.relname AS table_name,

    pg_size_pretty(pg_total_relation_size(i.indexrelid)) AS index_size

FROM 

    pg_stat_user_indexes i 

JOIN 

    pg_stat_user_tables t 

ON 

    i.relid = t.relid

ORDER BY 

    pg_total_relation_size(i.indexrelid) DESC;


Posted By Nikhil01:11
Filled under:

 The recent growth in the PostgreSQL database has been primarily driven by [provide specific reasons if known, e.g., an increase in transaction volume, new features or modules, data retention policies, etc.]. Below, I’ve compiled some statistics that illustrate the extent of this growth:

1. Database Size Growth Over Time

  • [Date 1]: [X GB]
  • [Date 2]: [Y GB] (Z% increase)
  • [Date 3]: [Current Size: W GB] (A% increase from last checkpoint)

2. Tables with Significant Growth

  • Table 1:
    • Previous Size: [X MB]
    • Current Size: [Y MB]
    • Growth: [Z% increase]
  • Table 2:
    • Previous Size: [X MB]
    • Current Size: [Y MB]
    • Growth: [Z% increase]
  • Table 3:
    • Previous Size: [X MB]
    • Current Size: [Y MB]
    • Growth: [Z% increase]

3. Top 5 Largest Tables

  • Table 1: [X GB]
  • Table 2: [Y GB]
  • Table 3: [Z GB]
  • Table 4: [W GB]
  • Table 5: [V GB]

4. Index Size Growth

  • Previous Total Index Size: [X GB]
  • Current Total Index Size: [Y GB]
  • Growth: [Z% increase]

These statistics indicate that [specific tables, indexes, or types of data] have been the primary contributors to the sudden increase in database size. It’s possible that recent application changes, increased data input, or even additional logging and auditing might be contributing factors.

To better manage this growth, I recommend the following actions:

  1. Review and Clean Up Unnecessary Data: Identify and archive or delete old or unnecessary data.
  2. Consider Data Compression: Explore PostgreSQL’s built-in data compression options to reduce the overall size.
  3. Evaluate Index Usage: Review existing indexes to ensure they are necessary and consider dropping any that are not being utilized effectively.

Please let me know if you’d like to discuss this further or if there’s anything specific you’d like me to investigate.

Posted By Nikhil01:03

Monday, 19 August 2024

Filled under:

I wanted to bring to your attention that we have observed a significant growth in the PostgreSQL database associated with your application. This increase is leading to a rapid consumption of the available filesystem space, which could potentially impact the performance and stability of the application if not addressed promptly.

Given the current trajectory of database growth, I strongly recommend that we take immediate action to increase the disk space allocated to the database. This will ensure that the application continues to operate smoothly without any interruptions or degradation in performance.

Posted By Nikhil19:00

Friday, 16 August 2024

Filled under:

 we introduced automation via Request Items (RITM), allowing users to create restore points directly through RITM, bypassing the need for a formal change request. While this automation was intended to simplify the process, we discovered a few challenges. In some environments, the RITM-based automation failed to create restore points as expected. Additionally, RITM's limitation of retaining restore points for a maximum of 48 hours did not always meet our needs for longer-term retention.

To address these issues, we are now adopting a revised approach. Moving forward, we will require users to submit a formal change request for creating restore points. At the same time, we encourage you to initiate the process by raising an RITM. Our team will be available to provide support if there are any failures with the RITM process or if you need to keep a restore point for more than 48 hours.

Posted By Nikhil20:41

Thursday, 15 August 2024

N

Filled under:

 I hope you’re well.

I wanted to check in regarding some issues we've been experiencing with long-running backups. We've observed a pattern where these issues are specific to servers in the America region.

Could you please let me know if there are any ongoing problems with the backup infrastructure that might be contributing to this? I’ve attached the relevant emails for your reference.

Thank you for your assistance.

Posted By Nikhil01:20
Filled under:

 I am writing to request an analysis of the file generation rate over the past 20 days. Specifically, I am interested in determining whether there has been a significant increase in the file generation rate that might justify a space extension for an hour. Additionally, I would like to investigate if there has been any unusual pattern in the Write-Ahead Log (WAL) generation over the past 2 days.

Your insights on these matters will be invaluable in helping us decide on the necessary actions. Please let me know if you need any additional information or if there are specific metrics I should provide to assist with your analysis

Posted By Nikhil00:29

Wednesday, 14 August 2024

Filled under:

 ChatGPT 4o mini

Posted By Nikhil03:02